EdR SICAV Euro Sustainable Equity

Download Profile

FR0010505578, FR0013400074, FR0013307717, FR0013417516, FR0010769729, FR0013444031, FR0010850198, FR0013287588, FR0013444049, FR001400GFA5

Issuer Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management (France)
Fund provider Edmond de Rothschild Asset Management (France)
Fund type/Asset class Equity fund
Legal form SICAV
Fund issue date 05/07/1984
Last Update 02.01.2024
Benchmark MSCI EMU (NR)
Tranche -
FNG Siegel

Risk Indicator (PRIIP)
6 of 7

Licensed in
D, A, CH, LU

Classification by SFDR
Article 8

EU Taxonomy
-

% of Sustainable Investments according to SFDR
-

Principal Adverse Impacts

No explicit details regarding the principal adverse impacts.

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG

No Poverty

SDG

Zero Hunger

SDG

Good Health and Well-being

SDG

Quality Education

SDG

Gender Equality

SDG

Clean Water and Sanitation

SDG

Affordable and Clean Energy

SDG

Decent Work and Economic Growth

SDG

Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

SDG

Reduced Inequality

SDG

Sustainable Cities and Communities

SDG

Responsible Consumption and Production

SDG

Climate Action

SDG

Life Below Water

SDG

Life on Land

SDG

Peace and Justice Strong Institutions

SDG

Partnerships to achieve the Goal

Normal allocation

Equities 80 % to 100 %
Bonds 0 % to 20 %
Money market/Bank deposits 0 % to 20 %
Commodities Excluded
Direct investments Excluded
Derivatives Excluded
Other -

Sustainability approach

Principal Adverse Impacts
-
Further remarks on the consideration of SDGs -
Rationale behind classification according to SFDR Article 8
Engagement Yes, organized internally Externer Link Link to engagement policy
Voting Yes, organized internally Externer Link Link to voting policy
Best-in/of-Class Best-In-Class We apply a Best In Universe Approach, i.e. favoring the best performing companies across sectors ( as opposed to BestInClass only) regardless of their financial rating, size or sector. Furthermore a differentiated weighting for the 3 ESG pillars for each sector us applied, depending on a sector's specifics. An in-house ESG rating is awarded to each position in line with industry, capitalization and ownership structure.
ESG-Integration Yes The sub - fund pursues a dedicated ESG strategy and as such invests in companies whose business model and activities provide solutions to the challenges of sustainable development. The analysis of non financial criteria (ESG and SDG) is taken into account and has an influence on the security selection for the portfolio. The ESG analysis covers 100 per cent of the portfolio holdings. The sub - fund is categorized under article 8 of the SFDR and in line with the BVI standard for sustainable funds. N = E
Norm-based screening
UN Global Compact ILO core labour standards
Themes
Climate change Agriculture and forestry Renewable Energies Water SDGs
circular economw, demographic changes,waste management, water supply, energy efficiency,healthcare, digitalisation
Impact Investing
-
Further information on the sustainability approach Externer Link Link to sustainability approach

Research and Transparency

In-house sustainability analysis Yes, 4
Research partners Yes Sustainalztics,ISS,RepRisk,CDP,Proxinvest,Carbone4, MSCI, Bloomberg
Percentage of portfolio with sustainability analysis 100 %
Strategically important suppliers included Yes
Sustainability advisory committee No
Analysis of portfolio CO2 Yes, backward-looking indicator Climate data, which feed our analysis, have recently been extended through our partnership with Carbone4.
Sustainability reporting Yes The indicators are available in the documents relating to extra-financial performance, the transparency report and/or the methodology and SRI management report of the different funds on our website
At least monthly portfolio publication Yes Externer Link Link to monthly portfolio publication
Certification/Label awarded by independent auditors
FNG Label ★★ Label ISR
Other febelfin,Climetrics

Environmental

Exclusion of sectors / areas of business – companies

Fossil fuels (Coal, Oil and Gas) Yes 5 % Turnover threshold
Nuclear power (operation and components) Yes 5 % Turnover threshold
Green genetic engineering N/A
Chlorine and agrochemicals (biocides) No
Other Oil sand and oil fracking 0%, not excluded but part of the ESG analysis: chlorine and agro chemicals, GMO technology,gambling,pornography,alcohol, animal testing

Exclusion of business practices – companies

Environmentally damaging behaviour Yes
Damage to biodiversity No
Other Serious and or repeated breach of the UN Global Compact

Exclusion criteria – countries

Non-ratification of the Paris Climate Agreement N/A
Non-ratification of the Protocol on Biosafety N/A
Non-ratification of the UN Biodiversity Convention N/A
Nuclear power by proportion of gross energy production N/A
Other -

Social

Exclusion of sectors / areas of business – companies

Weapons/Armaments Yes 5 % Turnover threshold
Cluster bombs and anti-personnel mines Yes
Weapons of mass destruction (ABC/CBRN) Yes
Tobacco products Yes 5 % Turnover threshold
Pornography No
Spirits/Alcohol No
Gambling No
Other -

Exclusion of business practices – companies

Labour rights (ILO core labour standards) Yes
Exploitative child labour Yes
Violation of human rights Yes
Animal testing No
Other -

Exclusion criteria – countries

Labour rights N/A
Violation of human rights N/A
Military spending as a percentage of GDP No
Death penalty, torture N/A
Countries classified by Freedom House as not free N/A
Violations of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty N/A
Violations of other non-proliferation treaties N/A
Other -

Governance

Exclusion of business practices – companies

Corruption and bribery Yes
Tax: planned avoidance & detected violations No
Other -

Exclusion criteria – countries

Corruption N/A
Other -

More on data availability

+

  1. EU Taxonomy
    It is possible that reported KPIs for taxonomy eligibility and alignment (being limited to corporate issuers / including only selected economic activities) are low or that KPIs cannot be reported due to limited data availability. Data may be available with a time lag. Data comparability may be limited due to differences in the scope of the economic activities considered. As soon as data is available in sufficient quantity and quality, it will be published in accordance with regulatory requirements.

FNG-Sustainability profiles disclaimer

+

  1. Bei den vorstehenden Angaben im Rahmen der FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofile  handelt es sich lediglich um Zusammenstellungen, Übersichten oder Sortierhilfen, die vom Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. wertungsfrei bereitgestellt werden.  
  2. Es wird ausdrücklich darauf hingewiesen, dass das Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. weder die Richtigkeit und Vollständigkeit noch die Plausibilität der in den FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofilen enthaltenen Angaben überprüft hat. Diese Angaben beruhen ausschließlich auf den von den jeweiligen Anbietern bereitgestellten Daten, auf die das Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. keinen Einfluss hat.
  3. Die Aktualität der eingegebenen Daten richtet sich nach dem im FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofil des jeweiligen Produkts angegebenen Aktualisierungsdatum, wiedergegeben ist also der Stand zu diesem Datum. Im Zweifel sind die bei der jeweiligen KVG hinterlegten Daten als aktuell zu betrachten. Das Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. hat darauf jedoch keinen Einfluss und kann daher keine Gewähr für eine jederzeitige Aktualität übernehmen, da die FNG-Nachhaltigkeits-Inhalte von den Anbietern selbst zu befüllen und ggf. zu aktualisieren sind.
  4. Die in den FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofilen bereitgestellten Informationen stellen keine Anlageempfehlungen dar. Sie dienen lediglich Informationszwecken zu bestimmten Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten und können weder eine fachgerechte Anlageberatung noch eine qualifizierte Produktaufklärung ersetzen. Es wird daher empfohlen, vor Kauf oder Verkauf der in den FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofilen aufgeführten Anlageprodukte die Dienste eines professionellen Anlageberater in Anspruch zu nehmen und die vollständigen Verkaufsunterlagen (insbesondere Verkaufsprospekt) des jeweiligen Anlageprodukts aufmerksam durchzulesen. Insoweit wird ergänzend darauf hingewiesen, dass Anlageprodukte generell mit Verlustrisiken bis hin zu einem Totalverlust behaftet und auch in der Vergangenheit erzielte Gewinne kein zuverlässiger Indikator für zukünftige Ergebnisse sind.