Artemis Funds (Lux) – Positive Future

Download Profile

LU2342621658

Issuer FundRock Management Company S.A.
Fund provider Artemis Investment Management LLP
Fund type/Asset class Equity fund
Legal form SICAV
Fund issue date 30/06/2021
Last Update 02.01.2024
Benchmark MSCI AC World Index
Tranche Private Investors Institutional Investors foundations
FNG Siegel

Risk Indicator (PRIIP)
4 of 7

Licensed in
D, A, CH, LU

Classification by SFDR
Article 9

EU Taxonomy
-

% of Sustainable Investments according to SFDR
-

Principal Adverse Impacts

PAI PAI

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

PAI PAI

Water

PAI PAI

Waste

PAI PAI

Biodiversity

PAI PAI

Energy Efficiency and Fossil Fuels

PAI PAI

Social and Employee Matters

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG

No Poverty

SDG

Zero Hunger

SDG

Good Health and Well-being

SDG

Quality Education

SDG

Gender Equality

SDG

Clean Water and Sanitation

SDG

Affordable and Clean Energy

SDG

Decent Work and Economic Growth

SDG

Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

SDG

Reduced Inequality

SDG

Sustainable Cities and Communities

SDG

Responsible Consumption and Production

SDG

Climate Action

SDG

Life Below Water

SDG

Life on Land

SDG

Peace and Justice Strong Institutions

SDG

Partnerships to achieve the Goal

Normal allocation

Equities 80 % to 100 %
Bonds 0 % to 20 %
Money market/Bank deposits 0 % to 20 %
Commodities Excluded
Direct investments 0 % to 100 %
Derivatives Excluded (for hedging only)
Other UCITS and/or other UCIs 0 % to 10 %

Sustainability approach

Principal Adverse Impacts
Greenhouse Gas Emissions Water Waste Biodiversity Energy Efficiency and Fossil Fuels Social and Employee Matters
Further remarks on the consideration of SDGs -
Rationale behind classification according to SFDR Article 9 The Fund aims to increase the value of Shareholders’ investments primarily through capital growth by investing in companies which meet the Investment Manager’s criteria for positive environmental and/or social impact. Positive impact is considered via a proprietary framework that considers intentionality, additionality and materiality, three widely recognised principles of impact investing. Each company is scored on this basis to determine its suitability for investment and its alignment with the targets and indicators which underpin the UN Sustainable Development Goals. The Investment Manager believes the best long-term growth opportunities will be innovative companies which are addressing the most significant sustainability challenges. Examples of environments or social themes which the fund intends to have a positive impact include, but are not limited to: reduction of carbon emissions, waste and water usage, better healthcare outcomes and lower cost, quality education. The Investment Manager will report, on at least an annual basis, on the environmental and/or social impact of the companies in which the Fund invests consistent with the stated strategy using both qualitative and quantitative assessments. The report will also provide details of the Investment Manager’s stewardship activities. The Fund applies a variety of exclusions, including those related to the exclusion of investment in fossil fuels, weapons/related strategic products and companies deemed in breach of the United Nations Global Compact principles on human rights, labour rights, the environment and anti-corruption.
Engagement Yes, organized internally Externer Link Link to engagement policy
Voting Yes, organized internally Externer Link Link to voting policy
Best-in/of-Class No
ESG-Integration Yes The team use a proprietary impact measurement framework to assess each investment opportunity. This analysis is framed in three dimensions: (1) Product Impact – A company‘s products and services have the biggest impact on the world. Analysing the direct and indirect impacts of these are paramount to understanding the company’s impact. Product impact is directly aligned with the company’s strategic positioning. (2) Practices Impact – A company’s leadership, culture and operational quality will determine its long-term outcomes. The impact it has on the world will be significantly influenced by these. Practices impact is directly aligned with operational quality. (3) Future Impact – The world is dynamic and in a continual state of flux. Businesses must set ambitious goals and seek to continuously improve or risk being left behind. We believe that our focus on understanding Product Impact in particular is a key differentiator versus many of our peers. We do this via a framework that considers and scores, intentionality, additionality and materiality, which are widely recognised impact investing principles: (a) Intentionality - Is the company's vision and mission consciously aligned with positive impact?; (b) Additionality - Is the company attempting to disrupt an unsustainable incumbent system?; (c) Materiality - Will the company have a significant positive impact on the world if it executes its strategy successfully?
Norm-based screening
UN Global Compact
Themes
-
Impact Investing
Environmental Social Governance
Our mission is to generate investment alpha for our clients by investing in disruptive companies that have a transformative positive impact. Why transformative? Because to address the environmental and societal challenges that we face in the timeframe we have, requires transformational rather than incremental changes to many industries. Society faces many significant issues; climate change, inequality of healthcare and educational access, diversity and inclusion to name but a few. But it is because these issues must be addressed which can also create an investment opportunity. As such, we are strong believers in the positive-sum outcomes that can be created by innovation, if the societal ‘value creation’ and economic ‘value capture’ incentives are aligned. The bigger the societal friction today, the bigger the future value creation opportunity is. Positive impact is considered via a proprietary framework that considers intentionality, additionality and materiality, three widely recognised principles of impact investing. Each company is scored on this basis to determine its suitability for investment. Certain factors are considered for all companies as part of this analysis, for instance, the evidence of a corporate mission, authenticity and experience of management, innovative culture and work practices, diversity and climate disclosures and performance and traditional corporate governance. In addition, depending on the nature of the company's operations, other sector, industry or company specific environmental or social factors will be considered. Various key performance indicators, both quantitative and qualitative, are used to measure positive impact, including: company alignment with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, GHG emissions, board diversity, water usage and recycling, reduction of waste and recycling, health (no. patients treated), education (no. students receiving higher education, training courses & educational assistance). A pass-fail approach is used when considering sustainable investments and for the for sustainable investment calculations. Because of the size and focus of the companies that the Fund invests in, revenues from sustainable activities are usually higher than 50%, but companies with a lower threshold may be deemed sustainable where it is clear that it is the ‘sustainable’ part of the business which is the strategic focus, receiving investment or the fastest growing and the direction of travel is to >50% of revenue on the proviso that the other parts of the business are not having negative environmental or social impacts.
Further information on the sustainability approach Externer Link Link to sustainability approach

Research and Transparency

In-house sustainability analysis Yes, 4 (1 part of the 4 man Artemis Positive Future investment team, plus 3 members of the Stewardship team))
Research partners Yes MSCI, Sustainalytics, ISS, TrueValue Labs, Bloomberg, sell-side
Percentage of portfolio with sustainability analysis 100 %
Strategically important suppliers included Yes
Sustainability advisory committee No N/A
Analysis of portfolio CO2 Yes, backward-looking indicator Per the 2022 Impact Report (https://www.artemisfunds.com/deu/professional/funds-in-focus/artemis-positive-future-product-impact-framework), the portfolio’s carbon footprint (Scope 1 & 2 emissions) is significantly less than its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI.
Sustainability reporting Yes Please refer to the 2022 Impact Report (https://www.artemisfunds.com/deu/professional/funds-in-focus/artemis-positive-future-product-impact-framework)
At least monthly portfolio publication No
Certification/Label awarded by independent auditors
FNG Label ★★ Luxflag Label

Environmental

Exclusion of sectors / areas of business – companies

Fossil fuels (Coal, Oil and Gas) Yes
Nuclear power (operation and components) Yes
Green genetic engineering Yes
Chlorine and agrochemicals (biocides) No
Other Biodiversity and land use (companies that the Investment Manager determines to be implicated in severe controversies related to the company’s use or management of natural resources)

Exclusion of business practices – companies

Environmentally damaging behaviour Yes
Damage to biodiversity Yes
Other -

Exclusion criteria – countries

Non-ratification of the Paris Climate Agreement No
Non-ratification of the Protocol on Biosafety No
Non-ratification of the UN Biodiversity Convention No
Nuclear power by proportion of gross energy production No
Other Not applicable

Social

Exclusion of sectors / areas of business – companies

Weapons/Armaments Yes
Cluster bombs and anti-personnel mines Yes
Weapons of mass destruction (ABC/CBRN) Yes
Tobacco products Yes 5 % Turnover threshold
Pornography Yes
Spirits/Alcohol Yes 5 % Turnover threshold
Gambling Yes 5 % Turnover threshold
Other -

Exclusion of business practices – companies

Labour rights (ILO core labour standards) Yes
Exploitative child labour Yes
Violation of human rights Yes
Animal testing Yes
Other UN Global Compact Compliance (the Ten Principles of which consider human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption)

Exclusion criteria – countries

Labour rights No
Violation of human rights No
Military spending as a percentage of GDP No
Death penalty, torture No
Countries classified by Freedom House as not free No
Violations of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty No
Violations of other non-proliferation treaties No
Other Not applicable

Governance

Exclusion of business practices – companies

Corruption and bribery Yes
Tax: planned avoidance & detected violations No
Other UN Global Compact Compliance (incl. anti-corruption)

Exclusion criteria – countries

Corruption No
Other Not applicable

More on data availability

+

  1. EU Taxonomy
    It is possible that reported KPIs for taxonomy eligibility and alignment (being limited to corporate issuers / including only selected economic activities) are low or that KPIs cannot be reported due to limited data availability. Data may be available with a time lag. Data comparability may be limited due to differences in the scope of the economic activities considered. As soon as data is available in sufficient quantity and quality, it will be published in accordance with regulatory requirements.

FNG-Sustainability profiles disclaimer

+

  1. Bei den vorstehenden Angaben im Rahmen der FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofile  handelt es sich lediglich um Zusammenstellungen, Übersichten oder Sortierhilfen, die vom Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. wertungsfrei bereitgestellt werden.  
  2. Es wird ausdrücklich darauf hingewiesen, dass das Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. weder die Richtigkeit und Vollständigkeit noch die Plausibilität der in den FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofilen enthaltenen Angaben überprüft hat. Diese Angaben beruhen ausschließlich auf den von den jeweiligen Anbietern bereitgestellten Daten, auf die das Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. keinen Einfluss hat.
  3. Die Aktualität der eingegebenen Daten richtet sich nach dem im FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofil des jeweiligen Produkts angegebenen Aktualisierungsdatum, wiedergegeben ist also der Stand zu diesem Datum. Im Zweifel sind die bei der jeweiligen KVG hinterlegten Daten als aktuell zu betrachten. Das Forum Nachhaltige Geldanlagen e.V. hat darauf jedoch keinen Einfluss und kann daher keine Gewähr für eine jederzeitige Aktualität übernehmen, da die FNG-Nachhaltigkeits-Inhalte von den Anbietern selbst zu befüllen und ggf. zu aktualisieren sind.
  4. Die in den FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofilen bereitgestellten Informationen stellen keine Anlageempfehlungen dar. Sie dienen lediglich Informationszwecken zu bestimmten Nachhaltigkeitsaspekten und können weder eine fachgerechte Anlageberatung noch eine qualifizierte Produktaufklärung ersetzen. Es wird daher empfohlen, vor Kauf oder Verkauf der in den FNG-Nachhaltigkeitsprofilen aufgeführten Anlageprodukte die Dienste eines professionellen Anlageberater in Anspruch zu nehmen und die vollständigen Verkaufsunterlagen (insbesondere Verkaufsprospekt) des jeweiligen Anlageprodukts aufmerksam durchzulesen. Insoweit wird ergänzend darauf hingewiesen, dass Anlageprodukte generell mit Verlustrisiken bis hin zu einem Totalverlust behaftet und auch in der Vergangenheit erzielte Gewinne kein zuverlässiger Indikator für zukünftige Ergebnisse sind.